Listes Can Graffiti Be Considered Art

Listes Can Graffiti Be Considered Art. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art.

Présenté How Does Graffiti Affects A Business

Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art.

They add to the cities beauty more than deface it.

Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements.

Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art.. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred.

It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others.. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. There are better venues for art. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art.

Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible... Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. There are better venues for art. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint ….. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art.

It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art... Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.

It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others... Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. There are better venues for art. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others.. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is.

Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon.. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art.

He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years... It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint …

In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. There are better venues for art. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art.

The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork.. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is.

There are better venues for art.. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. There are better venues for art. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred.

In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred... Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art.

Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. There are better venues for art. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible.

He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon... It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art.

I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues... With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues.

If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art... It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years.

Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly. There are better venues for art.

There are better venues for art... Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art.. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.

It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others... With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years... It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements.

Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint …. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible.

It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. There are better venues for art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is.

Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years.. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon.

I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is... Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art.

There are better venues for art. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. There are better venues for art. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon.. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.

If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art... If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint …. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.

Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art.. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. There are better venues for art.

It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues.. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art.

Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly They add to the cities beauty more than deface it.

Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible.. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art.

Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it... It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others.

It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint …. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others.

There are better venues for art.. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. There are better venues for art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred.

He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art... Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.

It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. There are better venues for art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible.. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.

In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint …

There are better venues for art. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. There are better venues for art.. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.

It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art.. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues.

The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred.

Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. There are better venues for art. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it.. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property.

Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. Even if van gogh had taken his talents and went and painted on the venus de milo statue, it would not have been considered art. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. There are better venues for art. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it.. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements.

He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon... Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon... Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.

Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years.

Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art.. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. I asked my friend anthony if he thinks graffiti should be and art and this is what he had to say, "i feel that graffiti should be considered an art because just like any other piece of artwork. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon. But to some people but in some wonderful minds graffiti is considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it. It is a simple mind that can not understand the respect for the property of others. It can also be carried out through color, words, or a mixture of these elements. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. They add to the cities beauty more than deface it.

The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. He has made fans from all over the world and people are trying to out his work in museums despite the fact that graffiti is usually frowned upon.. Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible.

Even though graffiti has controversial aspects including gang affiliation and unnecessary loss of tax money, graffiti should be considered a form of art. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. Some do not perceive graffiti as an actual art. If the artist works for a company to sell their product, this would most likely be considered art. Graffiti typically involves the use of spray paint to produce words and images on pieces of many times, private property. With the growing number of fine art programs, we can see that many artists use graffiti to create a conversation about social issues. Also graffiti can be used to express one's feelings to the world, as long as it's used correctly

Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.. Google.com defines art as " the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." graffiti has been a great debate in the art world for many years. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred.

Tagging, imo is nothing more that dogs marking their territory in the most destructive way possible. The argument about this is whether or not graffiti can be an art, and in banskys case it is. It is becoming more and more popular for local artists to speak their minds and paint … There are better venues for art. In art school, the lines between what is considered art and graffiti are blurred. Some of it cause some of it stands for gangs and stuff.